HMS Belfast

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Portsmouth Bill
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Re: HMS Belfast

#11 Post by Portsmouth Bill »

A fine drawing. The only real criticism I can offer up is that the rudder shading feels a bit heavy.
No problem, I'll include that in the final version.
User avatar
Rowdy36
Posts: 942
Joined: August 1st, 2010, 7:51 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: HMS Belfast

#12 Post by Rowdy36 »

A great drawing of a great ship :) like rifleman I've been waiting for this ship to make an appearance.
Image
User avatar
WhyMe
Posts: 1616
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Re: HMS Belfast

#13 Post by WhyMe »

As usual, Bill's drawing is beyond praise.
KimWerner wrote:I thought warships have round badges and the other shapes to support vessels and so? Anyone having a simple explanation? :?:
According to wiki prior to 1940 it was like this:
Wikipedia wrote:circles for battleships, pentagons for cruisers, 'U'-shaped shields for destroyers, and diamonds for auxiliary units, including depot ships, small war vessels, and aircraft carriers.
Thus the badge is correct shape. Round badge would be OK as well though :)
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: HMS Belfast

#14 Post by Novice »

Magnificent work Bill. I'm hoping to see the 1943 version as well as the 1959 version (the ship as she is now at the Pool of London)
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
User avatar
Portsmouth Bill
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Re: HMS Belfast

#15 Post by Portsmouth Bill »

Thanks for the info on ships badges. Re the various representations: 1939,1943,1952? (Korea), finally the rebuild as she appears now. I'm not that interested in showing the current camouflage, as (as far as I know) this was never applied in service on the rebuild, but is more for the tourists.
graham
Posts: 209
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 10:49 am

Re: HMS Belfast

#16 Post by graham »

Thanks for doing that drawing, I still think that the Manchester/Liverpool/Gloucester (3rd sub group of the Towns) are the "best Looking" britisher cruisers but Belfast has look and feel of of its own which you have captured to a T

BZ

Graham
PS when are we going to see the Neptune?
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: HMS Belfast

#17 Post by Novice »

Portsmouth Bill wrote:Thanks for the info on ships badges. Re the various representations: 1939,1943,1952? (Korea), finally the rebuild as she appears now. I'm not that interested in showing the current camouflage, as (as far as I know) this was never applied in service on the rebuild, but is more for the tourists.
The current camouflage is the ship as she was in 1943, and was applied for the tourists, since after the war she was grey overall.
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
User avatar
Bombhead
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm

Re: HMS Belfast

#18 Post by Bombhead »

She only got that colour scheme about 7-8 years ago,before that she was battleship grey all over.
User avatar
Portsmouth Bill
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Re: HMS Belfast

#19 Post by Portsmouth Bill »

Yes, I thought that was the case: nice for the tourists but not historically accurate; which makes me wonder as its part of the Imperial War Museum.
ALVAMA

Re: HMS Belfast

#20 Post by ALVAMA »

Great drawing! I've seen her in real-life last summer with my school trip! :D
Post Reply