Full credit goes to users that made the original aircraft: (Darth Panda, nighthunter, etc.)
Send me a quick message if i accidentally did not give credit to the creators of the aircraft.
More are to come soon.
Aircraft designs that i modified
Moderator: Community Manager
-
Filthy-Prankd
- Posts: 8
- Joined: July 16th, 2016, 2:15 am
Aircraft designs that i modified
Shown here are aircraft that i have modified.
Full credit goes to users that made the original aircraft: (Darth Panda, nighthunter, etc.)
Send me a quick message if i accidentally did not give credit to the creators of the aircraft.
More are to come soon.
Full credit goes to users that made the original aircraft: (Darth Panda, nighthunter, etc.)
Send me a quick message if i accidentally did not give credit to the creators of the aircraft.
More are to come soon.
Re: Aircraft designs that i modified
First of all, welcome to the Shipbucket! 
It's nice that You're trying, but I'm afraid that I can't really say anything genuinely positive about Your work.
1) Is it supposed to be Pe-2 or it's just a loose idea about "how would Pe-2 look if it look more like VI-100 and less than it actually looked like"? Because if it's supposed to be Pe-2, then it should be captioned "Soviet Union, Petlyakov Pe-2". Also the credits should be (Kilomuse & Filthy-Prankd) - made with more-or-less same font (which shouldn't be bold, and generally You ought to take care about anti-aliasing).
2) SB/FD drawings should have shading - parts that are oriented upwards should have lighter shade (becuse the light falls on them), while those oriented downwards should have darker shade.
3) As far as I know, both Soviet and Finnish Pe-2's didn't had camouflaged bottom parts of the wings (and fuselage etc. etc.).
http://wp.scn.ru/en/ww2/b/265/1/0
http://wp.scn.ru/en/ww2/b/265/78/0
4) And last but not least - although Pe-2 was a direct descendant of VI-100, trying to use the drawing of VI-100 to make Pe-2 is practically pointless, as the only major part that could be perhaps useful to retain from such drawing would be rear part of the fuselage - after sufficient adaptation (that is, without having aft crew compartment simply erased, leaving a huge dent in the upper fuselage
). In reality, the vertical stabilzers, wings, engine nacelles, cockpit and nose were all different in Pe-2.
It just so happens, that I'm working on Pe-2 right now and I believe that more correct representation would be more like this:
(and no, You're not supposed to use it at this point - not before it's "formally" posted on template and so on)
It's nice that You're trying, but I'm afraid that I can't really say anything genuinely positive about Your work.
1) Is it supposed to be Pe-2 or it's just a loose idea about "how would Pe-2 look if it look more like VI-100 and less than it actually looked like"? Because if it's supposed to be Pe-2, then it should be captioned "Soviet Union, Petlyakov Pe-2". Also the credits should be (Kilomuse & Filthy-Prankd) - made with more-or-less same font (which shouldn't be bold, and generally You ought to take care about anti-aliasing).
2) SB/FD drawings should have shading - parts that are oriented upwards should have lighter shade (becuse the light falls on them), while those oriented downwards should have darker shade.
3) As far as I know, both Soviet and Finnish Pe-2's didn't had camouflaged bottom parts of the wings (and fuselage etc. etc.).
http://wp.scn.ru/en/ww2/b/265/1/0
http://wp.scn.ru/en/ww2/b/265/78/0
4) And last but not least - although Pe-2 was a direct descendant of VI-100, trying to use the drawing of VI-100 to make Pe-2 is practically pointless, as the only major part that could be perhaps useful to retain from such drawing would be rear part of the fuselage - after sufficient adaptation (that is, without having aft crew compartment simply erased, leaving a huge dent in the upper fuselage
). In reality, the vertical stabilzers, wings, engine nacelles, cockpit and nose were all different in Pe-2.It just so happens, that I'm working on Pe-2 right now and I believe that more correct representation would be more like this:
(and no, You're not supposed to use it at this point - not before it's "formally" posted on template and so on)
-
Filthy-Prankd
- Posts: 8
- Joined: July 16th, 2016, 2:15 am
Re: Aircraft designs that i modified
Sorry. I'm a first timer on making artwork on shipbucket. I'm not really a great artist when it comes to drawing aircraft.
Re: Aircraft designs that i modified
You did nothing to apologize for. I just advise You to try getting more practice and take more attention to details.
-
Filthy-Prankd
- Posts: 8
- Joined: July 16th, 2016, 2:15 am
Re: Aircraft designs that i modified
well my bad.
-
Filthy-Prankd
- Posts: 8
- Joined: July 16th, 2016, 2:15 am
Re: Aircraft designs that i modified
After a few hiatus and school, i have returned, using WhyMe's A6M2-N model and modified to the legendary A6M. Don't know if I did good..
Re: Aircraft designs that i modified
Regarding the drawing: do something with anti-aliasing of the captions, and credits now should be (WhyMe & Filthy-Prankd).
But more importantly: Remove that photograph from the signature! It's not something proper for your petty amusement.
But more importantly: Remove that photograph from the signature! It's not something proper for your petty amusement.
-
Gollevainen
- Posts: 4715
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Aircraft designs that i modified
Yea, guys, use common courtesy and politeness when regarding signatures and avatars. I fixed the issue now manually, lets not repeat it, ok?
-
Filthy-Prankd
- Posts: 8
- Joined: July 16th, 2016, 2:15 am
Re: Aircraft designs that i modified
LOL, what was the signature? I missed it.
Filthy Frank as an avatar is a bit much for this forum, while I might laugh at it (I've been to the very depths of the internet and no depravity phases me), most of these guys won't understand it (certainly don't link his videos...)
Filthy Frank as an avatar is a bit much for this forum, while I might laugh at it (I've been to the very depths of the internet and no depravity phases me), most of these guys won't understand it (certainly don't link his videos...)