Submarines

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: Submarines

#161 Post by Novice »

As mentioned above here is Le Triomphant, thanks to DarthPanda who started it and sent me a WIP.
I hope it meets his standards :)

Image
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
Sheriff
Posts: 48
Joined: September 5th, 2010, 7:13 am

Re: Submarines

#162 Post by Sheriff »

Novice wrote:
Sheriff wrote:
Novice wrote:The raison d'être for the Gymnote
the nuclear powered SSBN Le Redoutable

comments anyone?
Would an SNLE be carrying SM.39 Exocet?
Well, according to French Navy official site the answer is yes.
What I was curious about was would they do it. I know they could do it. Using a very noisy anti-ship missile is not something likely to benefit an SNLE.
User avatar
odysseus1980
Posts: 3609
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Submarines

#163 Post by odysseus1980 »

Congratulations! Magnificent work! May the French mean that SM-39 can be used from any submarine, it is not nessecary to carry them.
User avatar
Colombamike
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille

Re: Submarines

#164 Post by Colombamike »

Image
Image
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: Submarines

#165 Post by Novice »

Sorry mike, I cann't see images from Imageshack, so if you can re-post through Photobucket or as an attachment :(
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Submarines

#166 Post by Thiel »

[img]ssbn616letriomphant1[/img]
Here you go Novice
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
User avatar
Colombamike
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille

Re: Submarines

#167 Post by Colombamike »

Deleted
Last edited by Colombamike on March 30th, 2011, 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Novice
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat

Re: Submarines

#168 Post by Novice »

THX Colombomike and Thiel.
I didn't know she was done earlier.
Any way I see now the pictures and my mistakes. I will change my drawing accordingly.
Image Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Submarines

#169 Post by Thiel »

Well, the shading is about as non-standard as it gets.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
ALVAMA

Re: Submarines

#170 Post by ALVAMA »

Thiel wrote:Well, the shading is about as non-standard as it gets.
How long you are on this forum now? There are no hard rules for Submarines ass said by both admins. It need to look shipbucketish, but more shade my be added, no black line needed. wings made be showed with origin shade style.
Post Reply