Oh no, not another Alaska...

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...

#31 Post by Ashley »

BrockPaine wrote:Incidentally, here are some photoshops I did a few years back of a USN fast battleship/fully armoured battlecruiser, in case anyone's interested. It's intended as a 12x14" gunned, 30-knot BC.
Looks like someone photoshopped my Alaska. Are they from the closed altnavy site?
In an AU, it could have been a predecessor to the Lexington BCs.
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
BrockPaine
Posts: 248
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 1:20 pm

Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...

#32 Post by BrockPaine »

Ashley wrote:
BrockPaine wrote:Incidentally, here are some photoshops I did a few years back of a USN fast battleship/fully armoured battlecruiser, in case anyone's interested. It's intended as a 12x14" gunned, 30-knot BC.
Looks like someone photoshopped my Alaska. Are they from the closed altnavy site?
In an AU, it could have been a predecessor to the Lexington BCs.
As I said, I did them myself for a USN fast battlecruiser design.
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...

#33 Post by Ashley »

BrockPaine wrote:As I said, I did them myself for a USN fast battlecruiser design.
Sorry, I didn't realize that. I like those Photoshops very much, they look very realistic.
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: 20s Alaska after fullscale refit

#34 Post by Colosseum »

Ashley wrote:The 20s Alaska after a late-war fullscale refit.
Image
I agree the aft of the early Alaskas is mid 40s style. Should be revised, too. Oh, and yes, I know how the above looks now. Would you believe, it was derivated from the first 20s Alaska drawing?
I believe the radar fit here is far too modern for 1935. Also, the midline 5"/38 is (like erik_t said) untenable. If anything, remove the aircraft-handling cranes and replace them with a 5"/38 mount. Not really sure why Midnightnova is credited in that drawing either.
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...

#35 Post by erik_t »

The correct radar fit for 1935 would be zero. CXAM didn't go to sea until 1940.
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...

#36 Post by Ashley »

If you follow the threads past you will recognize, the drawing is obsolete.
Here comes the corrected 1920s Alaska in 1945s refit:
Image
Now with fitting bow and stern. The old fashioned 12" turrets are obviously smaller than the original ones. Must have been hell to work in them. They are taken from Redhorses BB-26 South Carolina and refined.
After looking some minutes at the drawing, I think the fore 5"-turret would be removed later replaced by some Bofors 40mm.
Edit: I still have overseen the aircraft crane...
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...

#37 Post by Colosseum »

I think the superstructure has been far too "crammed together". The funnel is far too close to the citadel.

Interesting redraw, though.
User avatar
Ashley
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell

Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...

#38 Post by Ashley »

Funnel slightly revised, aircraft crane removed, boat crane added, some minor details.
Image
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
ALVAMA

Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...

#39 Post by ALVAMA »

I like it very much!
User avatar
dreadnaught111
Posts: 70
Joined: March 26th, 2011, 9:37 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida

Re: Oh no, not another Alaska...

#40 Post by dreadnaught111 »

I think we've got a winner! :mrgreen:

P.S. I think they should be called something other than the "Alaska"-Class. Maybe "Virginia" would work a bit better?
Fan of Dreadnaughts, Super-Dreadnaughts, Fast Battleships and Battlecruisers.
Post Reply