Thiaria: Other People's ships

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
JSB
Posts: 1433
Joined: January 21st, 2014, 5:33 pm

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#101 Post by JSB »

They look very nice 8-)

(my only point would be the narration, that no matter how obsolete the sea slugs are in he Falklands war the 8" would not be nice for anybody onshore ;) assuming the RN can still man big steam ships in 1980s)
Krakatoa
Posts: 2504
Joined: July 1st, 2014, 12:20 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#102 Post by Krakatoa »

Wonderful series of drawings GD.

With the series I did for the Princess Royal remakes, I got a lot of assistance from Hood on which radar should go where.

Did you give any thought to Raleigh and Hawke being armed with two by twin auto 6" forward, replacing the 8"?
BB1987
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#103 Post by BB1987 »

Surely they look good.
And so, I can see you've chosen to have a longer WWII in your timeline too :P
User avatar
llamaman2
Posts: 201
Joined: May 16th, 2015, 11:18 am
Location: Over there. Somewhere.
Contact:

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#104 Post by llamaman2 »

Great looking ships, GD :)
Hey, it's gotta be 5 o'clock somewhere...

Currently working on:
The October War, 27-10-1962 (apparently forever);
"Saxonverse" alt-UK;
Federation of the Channel Islands AU;
Republic of Yopur & Andaman;
some sort of overarching AU;

Regaining my sanity.
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#105 Post by eswube »

Great looking series. Keep it up! :)
adenandy
Posts: 1637
Joined: July 23rd, 2011, 1:46 am

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#106 Post by adenandy »

FAN-BLOODY-TASTIC looking ships GD :!:

I LOVE Them. Especially the later versions.... I wonder what a Falklands task faorce would have looked like, in 'your' world [hint... hint] :D

;)
Hood
Posts: 7243
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#107 Post by Hood »

That is a great series of cruisers.
I love them. I'll have a look over the radars. The only obvious thing is the Type 982 mattress radar on the early Sea Slug conversions. Type 965 would be much better. Only a few early 982s were ever made soon were replaced by the 'hayrake' antenna. in any case the 982 is a target indications radar and not a long-range search set.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
MihoshiK
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact:

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#108 Post by MihoshiK »

Excellent work. Can't say anything else about it.
Would you please not eat my gun...
Image
User avatar
Garlicdesign
Posts: 1071
Joined: December 26th, 2012, 9:36 am
Location: Germany

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#109 Post by Garlicdesign »

Hello again!

Thanks everyone. Pennant numbers edited, the new ones were (according to Navypedia, which seems to work again) never assigned to any capital ship, cruiser or aircraft carrier.

@Hood: Thank you for checking. I figured the 982 would function as a target indicator for the Sea Slugs, with the 992 forward indicating the targets for the 76mm and the Seacats and the 984 working as the main air search set. I was surprised how long the WW2-era 277/278 antennae remained in service (the 1960s Counties still had them), so the Admirals retained them too throughout the 60s. The 974/978 forward would be the navigation radar. That's what I thought anyway; I might be totally wrong, though ;)

Greetings
GD
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Thiaria: Other People's ships

#110 Post by Colosseum »

What's so impressive about this thread is how you've mastered the various "looks" and "feels" of the different nationalities you've represented. I'm a bit annoyed at myself for being so busy over the past 8 months and not following this thread. Everything is extremely well done!

My only recommendation would be to adopt a more respectful tone when writing about the sinking of these ships; you've got to remember that literally thousands of men would be killed in the most horrible of fashions when these things sink. I think that's one of the reasons most naval writers are very clinical in their tone, preferring wording such as "taking multiple shell hits and sinking" rather than "being hammered and split apart by 16" gunfire". Just a thought. I've seen this in a lot of AU writing and it's always bothered me. Even though the events (obviously) didn't happen it's best not to paint naval warfare as anything other than what it is: bloody combat in the most hostile environment for humans on earth.

Otherwise the stories read like a history textbook and I love it!
Post Reply