The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
very nice ships
Crimson / Emerald Class Destroyer
Thanks for the kind words, there's still some tinkering to be done with the 60s-80s fleet numbers but class wise I think I'm settled.
Next up from the stable of craziness is the double ended AAW Bristol... And her ASW half-sister.
Hugely expensive these are part of the reason that the smaller Type 17/42s appeared. They were routinely used as task group flagships due to their comprehensive command and control facilities and after the retirement of the Counties they took over the Command Cruiser role from them.
The ASW vessels were originally meant to receive a similar level of equipment fit as their AAW half-sisters including a VDS, SPS-01 and a Mk.13 forward. In the end however these proved too expensive to be justified so they were outfitted as depicted. Unlike HMS Bristol the ASW boats kept their Ikara until withdrawal.
The choice of a 76mm for these is two fold. For ASW work a 76mm is perfectly justifiable and has a useful secondary AA role. On the AAW vessels a larger mount would interfere with forward firing arcs of the Mk.13 ergo a smaller mount is used.
In due course these would receive ASSLM fitted fore in the AAW vessels and both fore and aft in the ASW vessels giving them a substantial lethality upgrade over the Harpoons shipped previously and in the case of the ASW boats a lethality upgrade, period.
~Mark.
Next up from the stable of craziness is the double ended AAW Bristol... And her ASW half-sister.
Hugely expensive these are part of the reason that the smaller Type 17/42s appeared. They were routinely used as task group flagships due to their comprehensive command and control facilities and after the retirement of the Counties they took over the Command Cruiser role from them.
The ASW vessels were originally meant to receive a similar level of equipment fit as their AAW half-sisters including a VDS, SPS-01 and a Mk.13 forward. In the end however these proved too expensive to be justified so they were outfitted as depicted. Unlike HMS Bristol the ASW boats kept their Ikara until withdrawal.
The choice of a 76mm for these is two fold. For ASW work a 76mm is perfectly justifiable and has a useful secondary AA role. On the AAW vessels a larger mount would interfere with forward firing arcs of the Mk.13 ergo a smaller mount is used.
In due course these would receive ASSLM fitted fore in the AAW vessels and both fore and aft in the ASW vessels giving them a substantial lethality upgrade over the Harpoons shipped previously and in the case of the ASW boats a lethality upgrade, period.
~Mark.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blood and Fire
- odysseus1980
- Posts: 3607
- Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
- Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
A very good proposal for the Type82. Well done!
Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
As usual, another beauty of a drawing!
Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
Nice work B.B. they look like powerful ships for their size.
Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
Amazing ships Blackbuck!
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!
Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
, my only question is why the second 3' on the ASW ? why not fit Air (cheaper) or Harpoon (AsufW) or more hangar space (ASW)
JSB
JSB
Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
Thanks for the praise gents.
The simple fact of the matter JSB is why not? It's wasted space on a design that is already overly large for what they ship. Ergo the more firepower you can ship for the least amount of money the better. The carousel of the 76mm is pitiful in terms of penetration where it is, it has about the same impact as a Type 909... Without deviating from the original hull structure a larger hangar is impossible to work in, two Hueys is plenty enough when you consider that the west of the task groups they operate with will either have their own Huey or Huey predecessor.
They lack Harpoon due to cost reasons, otherwise they'd have gotten SPS-01 and the whole plethora of fittings that the AAW vessels have. They do however as I previously mentioned get a Mach 4.5 AShM in due course which puts Harpoon to shame.
The simple fact of the matter JSB is why not? It's wasted space on a design that is already overly large for what they ship. Ergo the more firepower you can ship for the least amount of money the better. The carousel of the 76mm is pitiful in terms of penetration where it is, it has about the same impact as a Type 909... Without deviating from the original hull structure a larger hangar is impossible to work in, two Hueys is plenty enough when you consider that the west of the task groups they operate with will either have their own Huey or Huey predecessor.
They lack Harpoon due to cost reasons, otherwise they'd have gotten SPS-01 and the whole plethora of fittings that the AAW vessels have. They do however as I previously mentioned get a Mach 4.5 AShM in due course which puts Harpoon to shame.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blood and Fire
Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
Great work Bb. My only question is: what on earth is that hassle in underwater hull ? Just asking
Re: The Federal Monarchy Of Tol Galen
I'm not overly sure what you're referring to there. The fin stabiliser arrangement?
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Blood and Fire