I've re-uploaded it with a double on a white background (refresh might be needed).Novice wrote:Can you re-post it with white background, and not transparent, for those of us who use MS-Paint?
Planebucket Discussion Thread
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Planebucket
Re: Planebucket
THX very much WhyMe
Thank you Kim for the crest"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Re: Mohawk19k's P5M-2
She's horribly out of scale, on the order of 50% or so.
With the MAD boom she should be 201 px long, you have her 295.
She's horribly out of scale, on the order of 50% or so.
With the MAD boom she should be 201 px long, you have her 295.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
TimothyC wrote:Re: Mohawk19k's P5M-2
She's horribly out of scale, on the order of 50% or so.
With the MAD boom she should be 201 px long, you have her 295.
RGR, my first try......working to fix it....thank you!
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Yes, out of scale.
My best guesses:
1.) you scaled the hatches on the plane to the same as on what would be a ship. In real life, you have to duck down and crawl through them.
2.) you didn't take into account the MAD boom in length. By my rough calculations (mostly by having done this myself), that would account for the error.
My best guesses:
1.) you scaled the hatches on the plane to the same as on what would be a ship. In real life, you have to duck down and crawl through them.
2.) you didn't take into account the MAD boom in length. By my rough calculations (mostly by having done this myself), that would account for the error.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Don't worry, I've just discovered that Darth Panda's C-5 is also out of scale.
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
-
Gollevainen
- Posts: 4712
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
I fear many of the planes can be out of scale. Expecially the older ones...
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Oh many are, but most are within a fudge factor of 5% or less. I've considered doing a survey of all the planes, but I'm not sure it would be appreciated by everyone else.Gollevainen wrote:I fear many of the planes can be out of scale. Expecially the older ones...
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
-
Gollevainen
- Posts: 4712
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
I wouldn't mind, I know (or predict atleast) there are scaling errors in my own contributions, so atleast I would know what needs to be redone then.Oh many are, but most are within a fudge factor of 5% or less. I've considered doing a survey of all the planes, but I'm not sure it would be appreciated by everyone else.
Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread
Thank you!klagldsf wrote:Yes, out of scale.
My best guesses:
1.) you scaled the hatches on the plane to the same as on what would be a ship. In real life, you have to duck down and crawl through them.
2.) you didn't take into account the MAD boom in length. By my rough calculations (mostly by having done this myself), that would account for the error.