![Image](http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/1888/bcussalaskacb11935.png)
Hull by Colo, superstructures by Midnight, cut & paste by me, torps are yours.
Moderator: Community Manager
1.) Aah, ridiculous... I like seriously professional put comments. Would you make it some more precise?klagldsf wrote:What...the...hell?
1.) No USN ship of that era would have that ridiculous a focsle
2.) below-waterline torp tubes went out of fashion with hull casemates
3.) Way too large, that's basically a Colorado with half of Wyoming's firepower
And I like people who can take fair criticism professionally.Ashley wrote:) Aah, ridiculous... I like seriously professional put comments.
You got the point... After all, let's torp it, forget it and make it new.BrockPaine wrote:6. The mix of the 1940s underwater hull aft, the 1910s underwater hull forward, the British bow, the modernist gun turrets, and the late 1910s USN superstructure makes the ship look like a German-drawn pantomime of an American ship.
It's an interesting theory to start with, in fairness - I just don't think the design holds up based on the factors prevailing in 1921.Ashley wrote:You got the point... After all, let's torp it, forget it and make it new.BrockPaine wrote:6. The mix of the 1940s underwater hull aft, the 1910s underwater hull forward, the British bow, the modernist gun turrets, and the late 1910s USN superstructure makes the ship look like a German-drawn pantomime of an American ship.