USA - Montana Class Battleship

Post any drawings of planned or conceptual ships.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#201 Post by TimothyC »

Colosseum wrote:A new version of the CXAM would be great. I think Timothy had some schematics for it... would be useful if he could repost them here.
I have XAF, of which CXAM was a simplified version.

Image 1
Image 2.
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
BB1987
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#202 Post by BB1987 »

TimothyC wrote:
Colosseum wrote:A new version of the CXAM would be great. I think Timothy had some schematics for it... would be useful if he could repost them here.
I have XAF, of which CXAM was a simplified version.

Image 1
Image 2.
Thanks :D

Anyway, according to the text in your second picture, XAF and CXAM are the very same radar, is CXAM-1 (recently redrawn by Colo) that is a simplified version.
Karle94
Posts: 2135
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#203 Post by Karle94 »

The CXAM was the prototype radar that incorporated the good things from the XAM and CXZ. The CXAM-1 was the radar that entered service, and as such, it is logical for it to be the simplified version. I am not quite sure, you shoud ask Colo or wait for him to drop in.
BB1987
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#204 Post by BB1987 »

Well, meanwhile here is my attempt on the XAF/CXAM with various variants to choose from. Only one to be retained as the "definitive" one after evaluation.
Image
I've included the pedestals based on both Timothy's pic and the USS Northampton's one (can be found on Wikipedia's article about the CXAM).
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#205 Post by Colosseum »

I quite like that - excellent job. I prefer the lighter version with extra details personally.
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#206 Post by erik_t »

I concur, although a pixel (upper right) seem missing from the truss-frame.
TimothyC
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact:

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#207 Post by TimothyC »

Splendid work BB.
BB1987 wrote:Anyway, according to the text in your second picture, XAF and CXAM are the very same radar, is CXAM-1 (recently redrawn by Colo) that is a simplified version.
Well, the full text says that CXAM was a re-engineered version. I'm sorry - I forgot I had this image, or I would have shared it earlier. Also, I wouldn't trust the pedestal in my picture to be accurate relative to what was installed on ships. It struck me as very much a display mount.
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#208 Post by Colosseum »

Here's my fool-around 1944 version. I used a Measure 32 camouflage design meant for the old CAs... though camo schemes were often adapted for different ships. I think the effect is decent. This isn't as "neat" of a drawing as I'd prefer (since I was modifying BB's work) but I think it came out alright.

Inspiration for this comes mainly from the photos of Iowa operating in the Pacific in 1943-1944.

Image
BB1987
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#209 Post by BB1987 »

erik_t wrote:I concur, although a pixel (upper right) seem missing from the truss-frame.
Maybe I've jsut exaggerated the attention to detail, but in timothy's first pic it appears that the upper truss is not exactly symmetrical, there is a shorter frame in the middle and a slightly longer one on the upper right-corner.


@Colo: she looks slendid!
Wolfman
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm

Re: USA - Montana Class Battleship

#210 Post by Wolfman »

Looks good, Colo!
Post Reply