Nihon Kaigun 1946

Post drawings from any Alternate Universe scenario here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#431 Post by erik_t »

I would definitely do away with the super-duper-firing main turrets (and super-duper-duper secondaries!).

You're likely to really not want to fire ahead and astern when you can avoid it, not with a main caliber so hilariously oversized, so the loss in theoretical low-angle head-on fire is not likely to be critical compared to the stability and workability gains from lowering B and C turrets.

(Or, for that matter, doing the sensible thing and building 3x nine-gun ships rather than 2x 15-gun).
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#432 Post by klagldsf »

apdsmith wrote:Hi colombamike,

I'd thought that in this AU, America and Japan were at peace by that point (unless I'm getting my AUs mixed somewhere, I'd thought that in nihon kaigun, the war was over in '46). Could be I've misread somewhere in the 40-odd pages of stuff, but my understanding of this AU is that it'd be quite out of character for the US forces to turn on the Japanese forces by that point?

Ad
Don't mind him, obviously the amount of attention he's paid to this thread prior to this point is exactly equal to zero.
User avatar
Colombamike
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#433 Post by Colombamike »

klagldsf wrote:Don't mind him, obviously the amount of attention he's paid to this thread prior to this point is exactly equal to zero.
Wrong,
I "occasionally" follow this thread...
Some designs look very realistic, others are totally exaggerated
apdsmith
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#434 Post by apdsmith »

Hi Colombamike,

That's a fair point, but of the two points you've made - first: % of Japan's military budget: I have no idea what it is, but I can imagine a scenario in which the US undertakes a Marshall plan for Asia (even if this would seem an unwise expenditure of that money); second: US dropping a nuke on an allied partner - do not match your usually well-researched (if not always tactfully-delivered ;)) critiques of other ships that I have seen.

Ad
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
Image
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#435 Post by klagldsf »

Colombamike wrote:Wrong,
I "occasionally" follow this thread...
That's not what current evidence is suggesting.
apdsmith
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#436 Post by apdsmith »

erik_t wrote:...super-duper-firing main turrets (and super-duper-duper secondaries...
Also, somebody please tell me that this is the official shipbucket term for such turrets :lol:
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
Image
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#437 Post by heuhen »

apdsmith wrote:
erik_t wrote:...super-duper-firing main turrets (and super-duper-duper secondaries...
Also, somebody please tell me that this is the official shipbucket term for such turrets :lol:
I did once draw an BB with 4 super firing turret in front!
User avatar
KHT
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#438 Post by KHT »

heuhen wrote:
apdsmith wrote:
erik_t wrote:...super-duper-firing main turrets (and super-duper-duper secondaries...
Also, somebody please tell me that this is the official shipbucket term for such turrets :lol:
I did once draw an BB with 4 super firing turret in front!
That's what I usually call a... Super-duper-puper-quper firing turret... I think. ;)
User avatar
Redhorse
Posts: 499
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:19 am

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#439 Post by Redhorse »

I've always been amazed at the bewildering complexity of Japanese superstructures. I don't think I could ever do them justice if I attempted to draw them.
Redhorse

Current Projects:
Republic of Texas Navy
FD Scale F-14s
emperor_andreas
Posts: 3908
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact:

Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946

#440 Post by emperor_andreas »

Redhorse wrote:I've always been amazed at the bewildering complexity of Japanese superstructures. I don't think I could ever do them justice if I attempted to draw them.
You're doing amazing work with the Texas AU. As someone from there, I feel as though I'm biased when I say I sorta-kinda wish the AU was reality. :mrgreen:
Image
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
Post Reply