Nihon Kaigun 1946
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
I would definitely do away with the super-duper-firing main turrets (and super-duper-duper secondaries!).
You're likely to really not want to fire ahead and astern when you can avoid it, not with a main caliber so hilariously oversized, so the loss in theoretical low-angle head-on fire is not likely to be critical compared to the stability and workability gains from lowering B and C turrets.
(Or, for that matter, doing the sensible thing and building 3x nine-gun ships rather than 2x 15-gun).
You're likely to really not want to fire ahead and astern when you can avoid it, not with a main caliber so hilariously oversized, so the loss in theoretical low-angle head-on fire is not likely to be critical compared to the stability and workability gains from lowering B and C turrets.
(Or, for that matter, doing the sensible thing and building 3x nine-gun ships rather than 2x 15-gun).
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Don't mind him, obviously the amount of attention he's paid to this thread prior to this point is exactly equal to zero.apdsmith wrote:Hi colombamike,
I'd thought that in this AU, America and Japan were at peace by that point (unless I'm getting my AUs mixed somewhere, I'd thought that in nihon kaigun, the war was over in '46). Could be I've misread somewhere in the 40-odd pages of stuff, but my understanding of this AU is that it'd be quite out of character for the US forces to turn on the Japanese forces by that point?
Ad
- Colombamike
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
- Location: France, Marseille
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Wrong,klagldsf wrote:Don't mind him, obviously the amount of attention he's paid to this thread prior to this point is exactly equal to zero.
I "occasionally" follow this thread...
Some designs look very realistic, others are totally exaggerated
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Hi Colombamike,
That's a fair point, but of the two points you've made - first: % of Japan's military budget: I have no idea what it is, but I can imagine a scenario in which the US undertakes a Marshall plan for Asia (even if this would seem an unwise expenditure of that money); second: US dropping a nuke on an allied partner - do not match your usually well-researched (if not always tactfully-delivered ) critiques of other ships that I have seen.
Ad
That's a fair point, but of the two points you've made - first: % of Japan's military budget: I have no idea what it is, but I can imagine a scenario in which the US undertakes a Marshall plan for Asia (even if this would seem an unwise expenditure of that money); second: US dropping a nuke on an allied partner - do not match your usually well-researched (if not always tactfully-delivered ) critiques of other ships that I have seen.
Ad
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
That's not what current evidence is suggesting.Colombamike wrote:Wrong,
I "occasionally" follow this thread...
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
Also, somebody please tell me that this is the official shipbucket term for such turretserik_t wrote:...super-duper-firing main turrets (and super-duper-duper secondaries...
- heuhen
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
- Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
I did once draw an BB with 4 super firing turret in front!apdsmith wrote:Also, somebody please tell me that this is the official shipbucket term for such turretserik_t wrote:...super-duper-firing main turrets (and super-duper-duper secondaries...
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
That's what I usually call a... Super-duper-puper-quper firing turret... I think.heuhen wrote:I did once draw an BB with 4 super firing turret in front!apdsmith wrote:Also, somebody please tell me that this is the official shipbucket term for such turretserik_t wrote:...super-duper-firing main turrets (and super-duper-duper secondaries...
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
I've always been amazed at the bewildering complexity of Japanese superstructures. I don't think I could ever do them justice if I attempted to draw them.
Redhorse
Current Projects:
Republic of Texas Navy
FD Scale F-14s
Current Projects:
Republic of Texas Navy
FD Scale F-14s
-
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
- Location: Corinth, MS USA
- Contact:
Re: Nihon Kaigun 1946
You're doing amazing work with the Texas AU. As someone from there, I feel as though I'm biased when I say I sorta-kinda wish the AU was reality.Redhorse wrote:I've always been amazed at the bewildering complexity of Japanese superstructures. I don't think I could ever do them justice if I attempted to draw them.