Escort cruiser's

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
apdsmith
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Escort cruiser's

#21 Post by apdsmith »

Jabba, we must not convict acelanceleot?

Shippy, I'd thought they both followed more-or-less ballistic trajectories (if anything, the smoothbore, tank-like guns would have the flatter trajectory, as they're designed to blast APDSFS out the muzzle at mach 4) - the main difference being the rifled round would stay ballistic longer as the round wouldn't tumble - have I misunderstood?

Regards,
Adam
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
Image
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695
youboat
Posts: 99
Joined: July 19th, 2012, 5:20 am

Re: Escort cruiser's

#22 Post by youboat »

Rifled guns are more stable at long range than smooth bore, however, for the same amount of propellant etc, smooth bores have a higher muzzle velocity. Trajectory or curve, are dependent on velocity, drag, weight, aerodynamics, sectional density........ Rifled guns can only fire APFSDS and HEAT ammunition with slip rings so the the projectile will not spin (you cannot spin a long rod penetrator and spin will reduce the effectiveness of HEAT jet). Smooth bores cannot fire HESH. Ships guns are rifled because they are almost always fired at targets at way beyond 3000m, nor do they use sub calibre non-exploding ammo.
Fred
In the works CURRENT
WW1 RN Chatham, Emerald
R, Mod R, K, Beagle, Acorn class DD's
Post Reply