Escort cruiser's
Moderator: Community Manager
Re: Escort cruiser's
Hi youboat,
Can you advise why smoothbores for main armament? I'd been of the understanding that such weapons would be detrimental to accuracy at combat ranges - modern tanks use smoothbore main armament (well, except british ones, anyway) - but that's because they fire APDSFS with fins on the back, and even then, the maximum range is ~4km or so, quite short range for a ship.
Regards,
Adam
Can you advise why smoothbores for main armament? I'd been of the understanding that such weapons would be detrimental to accuracy at combat ranges - modern tanks use smoothbore main armament (well, except british ones, anyway) - but that's because they fire APDSFS with fins on the back, and even then, the maximum range is ~4km or so, quite short range for a ship.
Regards,
Adam
Re: Escort cruiser's
I figured if your firing guided munitions then you don't want to spin them, plus iirc it also means higher muzzle velocity.
Fred
Fred
In the works CURRENT
WW1 RN Chatham, Emerald
R, Mod R, K, Beagle, Acorn class DD's
WW1 RN Chatham, Emerald
R, Mod R, K, Beagle, Acorn class DD's
-
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: Escort cruiser's
note that most if not all naval guns are smoothbores. naval guns are closer to artillery guns then to tank guns
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Re: Escort cruiser's
I'm pretty sure you mean the opposite.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Worklist
Source Materiel is always welcome.
-
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: Escort cruiser's
ow? I might remember that wrong, but weren't naval guns curved track guns while tanks have linear track guns?Thiel wrote:I'm pretty sure you mean the opposite.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Re: Escort cruiser's
By track, do you mean the rifling? Because a "curved track" gun would then be a rifled gun, which is indeed what most naval cannons are. Smoothbores (ie no rifling) are what modern not-British tanks use.
Worklist:
FFG Halifax Redraw
FFG Halifax Redraw
-
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Location: the netherlands
Re: Escort cruiser's
no, I mean the flight pad.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
Re: Escort cruiser's
Hi Ace, are you able to clarify, because I'm afraid I just don't understand this...
- shippy2013
- Posts: 658
- Joined: March 26th, 2013, 7:44 pm
- Location: Nottingham. United Kingdom
Re: Escort cruiser's
i think what ace means is trajectory of the projectile. smooth bore is more of a curved rising and then falling to target trajectory " curved track " were as a rifled gun is more of a direct line of sight to target " Linear Track"
correct me if I'm wrong?
correct me if I'm wrong?