Escort cruiser's

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
apdsmith
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Escort cruiser's

#11 Post by apdsmith »

Hi youboat,

Can you advise why smoothbores for main armament? I'd been of the understanding that such weapons would be detrimental to accuracy at combat ranges - modern tanks use smoothbore main armament (well, except british ones, anyway) - but that's because they fire APDSFS with fins on the back, and even then, the maximum range is ~4km or so, quite short range for a ship.

Regards,
Adam
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
Image
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695
youboat
Posts: 99
Joined: July 19th, 2012, 5:20 am

Re: Escort cruiser's

#12 Post by youboat »

I figured if your firing guided munitions then you don't want to spin them, plus iirc it also means higher muzzle velocity.

Fred
In the works CURRENT
WW1 RN Chatham, Emerald
R, Mod R, K, Beagle, Acorn class DD's
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Escort cruiser's

#13 Post by acelanceloet »

note that most if not all naval guns are smoothbores. naval guns are closer to artillery guns then to tank guns ;)
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Thiel
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Escort cruiser's

#14 Post by Thiel »

I'm pretty sure you mean the opposite.
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Escort cruiser's

#15 Post by acelanceloet »

Thiel wrote:I'm pretty sure you mean the opposite.
ow? I might remember that wrong, but weren't naval guns curved track guns while tanks have linear track guns?
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
Charwhick
Posts: 104
Joined: March 22nd, 2014, 1:28 am

Re: Escort cruiser's

#16 Post by Charwhick »

By track, do you mean the rifling? Because a "curved track" gun would then be a rifled gun, which is indeed what most naval cannons are. Smoothbores (ie no rifling) are what modern not-British tanks use.
Worklist:
FFG Halifax Redraw
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: Escort cruiser's

#17 Post by acelanceloet »

no, I mean the flight pad.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
apdsmith
Posts: 855
Joined: August 29th, 2013, 5:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Escort cruiser's

#18 Post by apdsmith »

Hi Ace, are you able to clarify, because I'm afraid I just don't understand this...
Public Service Announcement: This is the preferred SB / FD font.
Image
NSWE: viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5695
User avatar
jabba
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...

Re: Escort cruiser's

#19 Post by jabba »

Image
User avatar
shippy2013
Posts: 658
Joined: March 26th, 2013, 7:44 pm
Location: Nottingham. United Kingdom

Re: Escort cruiser's

#20 Post by shippy2013 »

i think what ace means is trajectory of the projectile. smooth bore is more of a curved rising and then falling to target trajectory " curved track " were as a rifled gun is more of a direct line of sight to target " Linear Track"
correct me if I'm wrong?
Post Reply