FD AU 2

Post all FD scale drawings here.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
daemyrs
Posts: 66
Joined: November 5th, 2012, 2:07 pm

Re: FD AU 2

#291 Post by daemyrs »

I think I have way too much time on my hands. All of these aircraft were used in the Unified States of Daemyrs' Air Force at one point or another.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
This last one should say "modified by Daemyrs", but I cba'd to fix it.
Image
Last edited by daemyrs on December 13th, 2013, 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Blackbuck
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom

Re: FD AU 2

#292 Post by Blackbuck »

Impressive! Whilst it saddens me that I've yet to see anyone make use of my designs for their AUs these are just as interesting. Can't help but think though the F100 engined Ching Kuo would either be better off actually being an F-16 or going back align the twin route with something like a pair of F414s or EJ200s... Namely because of why the FC-1 was conceived. Otherwise things seem to my coffee deprived brain to be in order.

~Mark.
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
No Gods, Only Monsters
squizzy
Posts: 173
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 1:52 am
Location: Adelaide, S.A Australia
Contact:

Re: FD AU 2

#293 Post by squizzy »

I would agree with Blackbucks sugestion with F404/414 and EJ200 or even the M88 (Rafale Powerplant) would make sense for a AIDC FCK-1 re-engine as they be in the more ideal size, range and class for this fighter type.
Image

"The British Air Farce have droopped their bums on the water works..They have scored a direct hot on the pimps"- British agent/gendarme Officer Crabtree, "Allo,Allo."
adenandy
Posts: 1634
Joined: July 23rd, 2011, 1:46 am

Re: FD AU 2

#294 Post by adenandy »

I think impressive drawings, none the less. well done! :)
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: FD AU 2

#295 Post by eswube »

Nice work indeed. :)
nighthunter
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm

Re: FD AU 2

#296 Post by nighthunter »

Image
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
User avatar
daemyrs
Posts: 66
Joined: November 5th, 2012, 2:07 pm

Re: FD AU 2

#297 Post by daemyrs »

Well, I've done my army/navy heavy-lift helicopter. What do you guys think? I'm especially looking for feedback on the skycrane.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Hood
Posts: 7238
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: FD AU 2

#298 Post by Hood »

I like all the helicopters. The Skycrane version looks good and I like the Puma meets Mil-10 look of these. The only criticism I have is that the tail rotor is too high, you could safely lower it quite a bit. At the moment it sticks out as oversized.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
User avatar
daemyrs
Posts: 66
Joined: November 5th, 2012, 2:07 pm

Re: FD AU 2

#299 Post by daemyrs »

Hood wrote:I like all the helicopters. The Skycrane version looks good and I like the Puma meets Mil-10 look of these. The only criticism I have is that the tail rotor is too high, you could safely lower it quite a bit. At the moment it sticks out as oversized.
It's based off of the Westland Westminster (which is where the overall body shape, as well as the main and tail rotor come from. I'm going to attempt to do a smaller one, but I might stick with this one.
Image
User avatar
klagldsf
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm

Re: FD AU 2

#300 Post by klagldsf »

Pretty impressive on all accounts. Any details on your AU?
Post Reply