Grays Harbor Designs

Post any drawings you have made that do not pertain to an Alternate Universe scenario and are not a never-built design.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1281 Post by Zephyr »

Yeah, it looks a bit odd to me too, but on this one I was loosely following the cancelled USS Oklahoma Class of Armored Cruisers from 1914. They were to have had a similar layout.

Image
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Karle94
Posts: 2135
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1282 Post by Karle94 »

Actually, if you look at my WWI American battleships, especially the Florida and Wyoming classes you will see what type of bridge is depicted on the Oklahoma, which is fictional I might add.
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1283 Post by Zephyr »

Fictional? I thought it was a design exercise that was never carried out because AC's were becoming obsolete. Hnh. Ah well. So now I've got a fictional ship based on a fictional ship. Kinda appropriate in a way. lol

As for the bridge form, I have it that way as a progression from my previous Ajax class, to try and give them a "family" feel.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Karle94
Posts: 2135
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1284 Post by Karle94 »

The ships on that website is marked as OD or NW. If I remember correctly that one is OD. Yep, just checked it, own design
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1285 Post by Zephyr »

ok. But for my purposes that is neither here nor there, honestly. I try for at least a little bit unique and not just clones of RW US and RN. True, I use them for inspiration, but I don't want carbon copies. I don't even remember what website it was from, I just found it last year when I was looking for images of the USS Washington (Seattle) and USS Tennessee (Memphis).
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1286 Post by Zephyr »

A little bit more on the Orion.

Image

Also, as comments seem to have stopped on the Gargoyle Class CV, I guess it is pretty much finished.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
denodon
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1287 Post by denodon »

Nice looking design. I'd be somewhat tempted to raise at least the fore funnel and aftmost funnels to keep smoke clear from your observation points. As it is the aft point is useless as smoke will be obscuring it whenever the boilers trunked to that funnel are operational.
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1288 Post by Zephyr »

What about just extending the pole mast? On second glance it does look a little squat.

And, i also just noticed ... unless i do something about the stern below the waterline, lighting the boilers will be pretty much a moot point anyhow.
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
User avatar
Zephyr
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1289 Post by Zephyr »

screws added, pole masts raised

Image
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Hood
Posts: 7234
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am

Re: Grays Harbor Designs

#1290 Post by Hood »

Looks excellent and a really nice design.
I only have a couple of tiny nitpicks, I'm not entirely sure on the tubular masts for this period (vibration problems etc.) and the searchlights are mounted too high for topweight concerns and they would be better lower down, perhaps where the spotting tops are now. The masts seem too tall in that respect, perhaps swap the searchlights and spotting tops and lower the masts and increase the top yards to compensate. They'll look less stubby then.
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Post Reply