HMCS Annapolis - 1996

Post drawings of ships that actually exist or have existed at some point.

Moderator: Community Manager

Message
Author
Tagger 1-1
Posts: 27
Joined: November 9th, 2013, 5:06 am
Location: BC

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#11 Post by Tagger 1-1 »

I have added my own modifications to your splendid drawing. I hope this helps to correct some of the flaws I discovered.

REDACTED

S/F Tagger sends
Last edited by Tagger 1-1 on November 9th, 2013, 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Colosseum
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#12 Post by Colosseum »

What exactly have you changed? I see some really poor shading and an anti-aliased "CANADA" on the side of the ship. I'm no expert but I think BCRenown's original was fine.

BTW what does "S/F Tagger sends" mean?
User avatar
KHT
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#13 Post by KHT »

He mucked up the masts(compared to SB standard) and added wiring, along with some antennaes. I have a feeling he didn't even bother asking BCRenown for permission.
User avatar
heuhen
Posts: 9104
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#14 Post by heuhen »

and since you are a new member you should post in the beginner topic, and not here. We have an system here at this forum that an combination of the administrator, moderator and us high end drawer will inform you that you are ready to post in any topic... The beginner topic is there most for telling us to relax... it's just his first or second drawing... even I had to go trough there, and after posting around 10 vessels... I was allowed to move on.
Tagger 1-1
Posts: 27
Joined: November 9th, 2013, 5:06 am
Location: BC

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#15 Post by Tagger 1-1 »

I have removed the drawing, preferring to keep it for my personal files than to distribute it on this forum to absurd contempt.

TAGGER 1-1, OVER AND OUT.
User avatar
BCRenown
Posts: 184
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 2:33 pm
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#16 Post by BCRenown »

I'm finally done with my HMCS Annapolis drawing. I've made numerous changes, mostly subtle ones. The forward sheer line proved to be the most challenging as was the lattice mast. I'm still not sure about the colours which look about right on my screen but not so on my son's. I guess there's not a lot I can do about that. For better or for worse, HMCS Annapolis:

Image



Image
Last edited by BCRenown on February 19th, 2014, 3:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Keep well and keep drawing,

Monty
erik_t
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#17 Post by erik_t »

A delightful drawing. The way you've captured the shape and curvature of the pilothouse and bow is really excellent.
eswube
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#18 Post by eswube »

Nice work. :)
acelanceloet
Posts: 7512
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#19 Post by acelanceloet »

I am not certain about all the double black lines in the mast, though.
the air search radar might benefit from some additional detail.
wasn't the surface search an SPS-10? as I see you have drawn an new one for that, did it have an different antenna then the USN version? same goes for the Mk 32 SVTT.
could we get the director as separate part?

other then those points, very nice work.
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin
User avatar
BCRenown
Posts: 184
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 2:33 pm
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

Re: HMCS Annapolis - 1996

#20 Post by BCRenown »

Thanks for your kind comment, Gents.

acelancelot,

I had a new mast stashed away and completely forgot about adding it :oops:

The SPS-10 in the "parts dept" is not the way I see it, although I maybe using an oder version. The radar and director were drawn from very good photos and I stand by them - for now at least. ;)
Keep well and keep drawing,

Monty
Post Reply